The MOOC Hypecycle. I was just wondering about this. Anyway, I think developments in open education are far from finished, but that the ‘hype’ of MOOCs may indeed diminish a bit this year or the next. I do think, however, that sustainable business models will emerge: value added services will be offered, most importantly assessment & accreditation, expert feedback/sessions, reputation and match-making, networking benefits, relevant affiliate marketing (books, university sign-up, tools), etc. There are just a lot of possible ways to maintain a free offer of high-quality content and courses, meanwhile offering all kinds of for-profit services.
Well written post about how to make money with open education. I actually believe most in the model suggested by Udacity, which is one of making money as a people-broker.
Udacity has suggested that it might double as a headhunter for companies that might like to hire some of its more impressive students. Instead of simply selling those students credentials that they can list on their resumes while looking around for jobs, Udacity would offer to match students with companies that have enlisted Udacity as a talent scout. (The company has already hired a full-time jobs counselor to lay groundwork with potential employers.) Udacity would take a commission for each successful match, same as a headhunter.
As, over time, millions of people follow open courses through platforms as Udacity and Coursera, and if they offer a large variety of courses (within one domain or more), they are able to know which of the learners are the best performers. Not only could they base their analysis of individual ‘value’ on knowledge (as we do now with credentials), but a platform like Udacity could, with added functionality, grow into a more encompassing learning network that monitors your interests, your ability and willingness to help others in the forums, scientific and social impact, and social network. This will give a more complete picture of someone than only the grades/courses done, as we see in traditional education. From this perspective, I also think that it will be difficult for traditional education not to jump on the OER bandwagon, but they should definitely consider these new players in the learning field and their own ability to offer something similar.
Read more on Inside Higher Ed.
Dan Pink - Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us (by theRSAorg)
Meanwhile, it will be fascinating to watch MITx mint a brand-new form of academic currency. What happens when it enters circulation? Will other universities accept it as transfer credit, or employers as proof of skills? How will those credentials affect the fast-growing market for online credits and degrees, much of which is driven by the expensive for-profit sector?
Last week, thanks to the course calendar, I...
What they did not want you to ever find out is that your generation, the generation born between 1980-1995, actually outnumbers the Baby...
Clint Hocking had a great talk on Wednesday regarding improvisational play, how it...
A VERY interesting debate has been going on this last week primarily between Gabe...